Heuristic Planning for Continuous Systems in Hybrid Temporal Situation Calculus
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Given a description of domain and its dynamics, temporal numeric planning attempts to find a sequence of actions that satisfies a given set of constraints for a dynamical system. Current planners operate on grounded transition systems and discretized representations of the domain which lead to poor scalability. Furthermore, given the problem’s difficulty, most modern planners restrict their capabilities to a subset of hybrid domains, e.g. support for only polynomial evolution of numeric state variables and linear action conditions. To address these concerns, we present a lifted planner, NEAT (Non-linEAr Temporal) Planner, that utilizes a logical description of the domain described in Hybrid Temporal Situation Calculus. Furthermore, we develop AMPLEX, an interface to AMPL and several non-linear programming solvers, which allows us handle several non-linear functions. We also present a novel non-linear programming based heuristic to improve scalability. Lastly, we perform a detailed comparison between current state-of-the-art solvers and our planner.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it