MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391662065 · doi:10.5737/23688653-3449

Medication Safety Practice Corner Key learnings: Preventing errors with intravenous acetylcysteine

2023· article· en· W4391662065 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Carolyn Hoffman, Sylvia Hyland, Mary Harber, L. A. Riley

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œCanadian journal of critical care nursing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsAcetylcysteineKey (lock)MedicineComputer scienceComputer securityChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ISMP Canada received three reports of death or severe harm involving intravenous acetylcysteine (also known as N-acetylcysteine) overdose related to one type of error—continuation of the loading dose IV infusion rate instead of reduction to a lower rate for the maintenance dose. All resulted in a 10-fold dosing error. An alert was published in 2022, and a follow-up safety bulletin in 2023 shared findings from a multi-incident analysis with recommendations (ISMP Canada, 2022 & 2023). There are many protocols/regimens in use across Canada for the preparation and administration of acetylcysteine, each with potential benefits and risks. This column shares key findings and several strategies to support the safe administration of acetylcysteine. Critical care nurses’ specialized expertise in patient monitoring and fluid management is vital for optimal care outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.133
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œCanadian journal of critical care nursingSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207