MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391662647 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02371780mtgabs

Impact of GDL Hole on Chemo-Mechanical Membrane Degradation Investigated by 4D in-Situ Visualization

2023· article· en· W4391662647 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yixuan Chen, Amin Bahrami, Nitish Kumar, Francesco P. Orfino, Monica Dutta, Esmaeil Navaei Alvar, Michael Lauritzen, Erin Setzler, Alexander Agapov, Erik Kjeang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situDegradation (telecommunications)MembraneVisualizationMaterials scienceChemistryComposite materialEngineeringMechanical engineeringElectrical engineeringBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is the core unit of a fuel cell system, which is composed of proton exchange membrane (PEM), sandwiched on both sides by catalyst layers (CLs) and gas diffusion layers (GDLs). The membrane is subjected to various chemical and mechanical stresses during fuel cell operation, and these stresses will cause membrane degradation over time. Also, the interaction between membrane and other fuel cell components such as CLs and GDLs contributes uncertainty to the membrane degradation process. Previous morphological studies [1] on CLs and GDLs discovered common non-uniform features in these materials such as clusters, sags, cracks, and holes. In addition, such features could also appear during the MEAs assembly [1] process. Previous membrane degradation study discovered buckling driven membrane failure [2], which is strongly related to CL or GDL sags, cracks, and holes. Additionally, impinging driven membrane failure was also reported [2], which is caused by clusters and peaks on CL or GDL surfaces. Models were also developed to understand the mechanism of mechanical membrane degradation related to buckling. For instance, Ramani et al. [2] created a model to simulate membrane buckling into GDL surface pores, and identified stress concentration at the buckling center as the root cause of crack formation. Comparing MEAs made with high and low surface roughness GDLs, it was confirmed that GDL with low surface roughness has significant mitigatory impact on mechanical membrane durability. However, to the authors’ best knowledge, the level of impact of such non-uniform features under combined chemo-mechanical degradation, which is the most common form of membrane degradation during regular fuel cell operation, has not yet been reported. In this work, the objective is to understand the specific impacts of GDL holes as they relate or contribute to the combined chemo-mechanical membrane degradation mechanism and associated membrane durability in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. The study was carried out using a four dimensional (three spatial dimensions plus one temporal dimension) in-situ methodology achieved through X-ray computed tomography (XCT) visualization [3], and the MEAs were made of GORE-SELECT® membrane, Pt based CLs, and AvCarb® GDLs with smooth and crack free microporous layer (MPL). Through-thickness circular GDL holes were introduced with multiple controlled sizes at multiple strategic locations, on anode or cathode GDL. The MEAs were custom designed small scale MEAs with 0.39 cm2 active area for in-situ XCT visualization, and the cells were subjected to a custom accelerated stress test (AST) protocol imparting combined chemo-mechanical stresses in an alternating pattern [3]. The graphite endplates had narrower flow field compared to previously used ones [3], which can reduce membrane degradation rate and better deliver compressive stress to the MEA. A baseline MEA without GDL hole was first tested, with only minor membrane thinning observed. For the GDL hole MEAs, it was discovered that smaller holes were more impactful on membrane durability than larger holes. Among the three selected hole sizes (2.0, 0.5, and 0.2 mm2), through-plane membrane cracks were only observed under the smallest holes, both at the hole center and edge, which are the two stress concentration locations. On the CL surface, cracks were observed at the GDL hole center as a crack network, and along the hole edge, as indicated in the figure. Although the GDL holes are expected to mainly alter mechanical membrane degradation, it was discovered that MEAs with through-plane membrane cracks also had higher membrane thinning rate compared to the baseline. However, the non-uniformity MEAs without through-plane membrane cracks had similar membrane thinning rate as the baseline test. Therefore, the through-plane membrane cracks likely elevated chemical stressors as well; hypothetically, through increased gas crossover. The AST results suggest that GDL holes can be harmful to membrane chemo-mechanical degradation and the level of severity depends on their size and location. Keywords: fuel cell; membrane durability; gas diffusion layer defect; mechanical degradation; chemical degradation; X-ray computed tomography Acknowledgements: This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canada Foundation for Innovation, British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund, Western Economic Diversification Canada, Ballard Power Systems, and W.L. Gore & Associates. This research was undertaken, in part, thanks to funding from the Canada Research Chairs program. References: [1] S. Prass, S. Hasanpour, P.K. Sow, A.B. Phillion, W. Mérida, Journal of Power Sources. 319 (2016) 82–89. [2] D. Ramani, N.S. Khattra, Y. Singh, F.P. Orfino, M. Dutta, E. Kjeang, Journal of Power Sources. 512 (2021) 230431. [3] Y. Chen, Y. Singh, D. Ramani, F.P. Orfino, M. Dutta, E. Kjeang, Journal of Power Sources. 520 (2022) 230674. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→