MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391663142 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02472401mtgabs

Early Failure Detection for CO2 Reduction Electrolyzers Via in-Line Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

2023· article· en· W4391663142 on OpenAlexaff
Colin P. O’Brien, Hugh Warkentin, Sarah Holowka, Benjamin Maxwell, Mariam Awara, Mark Bouman, Ali Shayesteh, Rachael Nicholas, Alexander H. Ip, Essam S. Elsahwi, Christine M. Gabardo, David Sinton

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDielectric spectroscopyReduction (mathematics)Electrical impedanceMaterials scienceLine (geometry)ElectrochemistrySpectroscopyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryElectrical engineeringEngineeringChromatographyElectrodePhysicsPhysical chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) presents the opportunity to produce chemical feedstocks and fuels directly from CO2. Recent achievements in energy efficiency and current density are approaching the targets required for commercial viability; however, stability remains more than two orders of magnitude below the required 80,000 h. In CO2RR there is a challenge to distinguish the cause of failure among many possibilities. Failure can result from initial setup (e.g. over or under compression of the membrane and electrodes), gradual degradation of components (e.g. cathode and anode catalyst restructuring and dissolution), accumulation of products or byproducts (e.g. alcohols or salt accumulation), or immediate failures (e.g. a hole in the membrane or a short circuit). These failure modes must be addressed to reach the targeted stability needed for the wide-scale adoption of this technology. Early identification and mitigation of these failures would increase the electrolyzer lifetime and the commercial viability of CO2RR electrolyzers. Current techniques to characterize failures of the electrolyzer rely on post-mortem analysis of cell components. The analysis of individual components after operation may not accurately reflect their state in operando. There are techniques that are capable of analyzing the cell in operation (e.g. XAS, Raman, and TEM), but these typically require modified cell architectures and are operated at lower reaction rates. To effectively diagnose failure, the analysis technique should be applied to electrolyzers operating under realistic conditions. Here we implement an in-line real-time electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technique to monitor CO2RR electrolyzers during operation. EIS is a non-destructive technique that can provide continuous information on the performance of specific components within the electrolyzer. We characterize common failure modes, such as poor compression, salt formation, catalyst degradation, and short circuits, and their identifying changes to the EIS response. We extract key electrochemical parameters from the EIS response and use them to develop a framework to identify and prevent the most common failure modes. Among other applications, this framework allowed for the detection of anode catalyst degradation 11 h before other indicators, such as cell voltage or product selectivity. This technique and framework can be applied to monitor CO2 electrolyzers as they are scaled and stacked.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→