MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391663382 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02412040mtgabs

The Oxygen Reduction Reaction on Pt and Ag Catalysts in Alkaline Media in Rrde and Half-Cell Setups

2023· article· en· W4391663382 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Rampf, Michael Braig, Stefano Passerini, Roswitha Zeis

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxygen reduction reactionCatalysisOxygenReduction (mathematics)ChemistryOxygen reductionFuel cellsMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryElectrochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) in alkaline media is essential to optimize alkaline fuel cells or metal-air batteries. The catalytic activity of various ORR catalysts has usually been evaluated via Rotating (Ring) Disk Electrode (R(R)DE) measurements. However, using an electrolyte with dissolved oxygen at low KOH concentrations measured in a microampere regime at room temperature does not reflect the real cell conditions.1 Yet, RRDE is still a valuable tool for probing the reaction pathway of catalysts in alkaline media. Our study combined traditional RRDE with Gas Diffusion Electrodes (GDEs) half-cell measurements using Pt and Ag catalysts. The polarization curve of Pt-GDE exhibits a kink near 0.8 V vs. RHE leading to a significant potential drop. This specific feature can be explained by the RRDE results, which display an increased peroxide formation in that potential region due to the adsorption/desorption of hydroxyl adsorbates.2 However, Ag does not exhibit such behavior since the peroxide formation is below typical operating potentials. Depending on the operating conditions, Ag can catalyze the ORR more effectively than Pt in alkaline conditions while significantly reducing production costs. Furthermore, our study presents a general approach for evaluating ORR catalysts under experimentally challenging conditions such as elevated temperature and high KOH molarity. References: (1) Ehelebe, K.; Schmitt, N.; Sievers, G.; Jensen, A. W.; Hrnjić, A.; Collantes Jiménez, P.; Kaiser, P.; Geuß, M.; Ku, Y.-P.; Jovanovič, P.; et al. Benchmarking Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts Using Gas Diffusion Electrodes: Inter-lab Comparison and Best Practices. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 816–826. (2) Ramaswamy, N.; Mukerjee, S. Fundamental Mechanistic Understanding of Electrocatalysis of Oxygen Reduction on Pt and Non-Pt Surfaces: Acid versus Alkaline Media. Advances in Physical Chemistry 2012, 2012, 1–17. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207