MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391663400 · doi:10.1149/ma2023-02542534mtgabs

Effect of Electrode Potential on the Surface Chemical Composition of Au-Pd Nanoparticles

2023· article· en· W4391663400 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Guay, Sagar Prabhudev, Sebastian Kohsakowski, Cybelle Palma de Olivera Soares, Jan Söder, Sven Reichenberger, Jacob Johny, Stephan Barcikowski, Ana C. Tavares

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrodeNanoparticleComposition (language)Materials scienceChemical compositionChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryPhysical chemistryArtEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palladium (Pd) nanoparticles have been investigated for the hydrogen evolution reaction, the hydrogen oxidation reaction, the oxygen reduction reaction, and the methanol and ethanol oxidation reaction. The high methanol/ethanol tolerance of Pd is noteworthy. A powerful approach to further improving the catalytic properties of Pd is through alloying with suitable co-metals. In the case of the ethanol oxidation reaction in alkaline media, Pd alloyed with Au has demonstrated excellent activity exceeding even that of highly active Pt catalysts (1). A complete miscibility, small lattice mismatch, and contrasting properties of Pd and Au make Au-Pd a unique model system. Marked changes in the reactivity of Au-Pd catalysts have been reported when conditioning and operating conditions are altered, which should be related to physico-chemical changes in the nanoparticles. Indeed, dealloying/dissolution and segregation of metals at the surface of nanoparticles (NPs) takes place during conditioning and operation, which have pronounced effect on the activity and stability of NPs. The migration of metals from the bulk to the nanoparticles’ surface may take place during pre-catalytic conditioning and during operation, and can be triggered by the presence of oxidation and reducing agents (2), changes in temperature, and potential cycling (3). Thus, it is critical to investigate the effect of electrode potential on metals dissolution and segregation occurring in alloyed nanoparticles. In the present work, Au-Pd NPs prepared by pulsed laser ablation in liquids were used. Pulsed laser ablation is a simple method to synthesize alloy NPs with high purity out of different material systems and with different compositions. Typically, alloy-metal targets or pressed micro-powder mixture targets are ablated or fragmentated in liquid, respectively. Notably, the technique does not require any surfactant additives to achieve NPs stability in the electrolyte, thus allowing for NPs to remain free of associated contamination from the capping agents. We will show how one can fine-tuned the Au and Pd surface fraction of bimetallic Au-Pd nanoparticles using electrochemistry. The method involves electrochemical cycling in alkaline medium at a suitable upper vertex potential, resulting in a controllable diffusion of Pd atoms from the core to the shell. This preferential outward diffusion of Pd atoms occurs because of the electrochemical adsorption of oxygen atoms at the surface of NPs, which is driven by the application of a potential. This potential has to be positive enough for oxygen atoms to adsorb at the surface of the NPs, and therefore is dependent on the nature of the surface atoms. On AuPd NPs that are enriched with Au atoms, a potential of +1.5 V vs. RHE must be applied to form ca. 1 ML of adsorbed oxygen at the surface of gold and initiate the diffusion of Pd atoms from the core to the NP surface. This approach marks a new avenue in the development of compositionally-controlled electrocatalysts and can be tailored to suit different applications with a simple switch of voltage or a controlled pretreatment. References [1] J. B. Xu, et al , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 35 (2010) 6490-6500. [2] H.L. Xin, et al , Nano Lett., 14 (2014) 3203-3207. [3] E. Pizzutilo, et al , A CS Catal. 2017, 7, 9, 5699–5705.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactionsFrench-language works237,207