MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391665388 · doi:10.31157/an.v1iinpress.507

Implementación del código estado epiléptico en México: tiempo es cerebro

2023· article· es· W4391665388 on OpenAlexaff
Elma Paredes‐Aragón, Iris E. Martínez Juárez, Elvira Castro Martínez, Mijail Rivas Cruz, Alonso Gutiérrez Romero, Anwar Garcia, Juan Carlos López Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivos de Neurociencias · 2023
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introducción: El estado epiléptico es una urgencia neurológica. Se calcula una incidencia de 61 casos por 100,000 habitantes/año. Se estima una mortalidad entre el 20% y el 80%, siendo altamente dependiente de la eficacia y rapidez del manejo, la etiología y los factores de riesgo. Métodos: En esta síntesis narrativa, los autores revisaron la evidencia científica actual y elaboraron una propuesta de expertos para el manejo adaptada para México. Resultados y discusión: Sintetizamos los datos actuales de la evidencia médica para estado epiléptico, con un enfoque practico para la mejora del manejo de los pacientes con estado epiléptico. Conclusión: Los pacientes con estado epiléptico deben tratarse de forma estandarizada para prevenir morbimortalidad y utilizar de forma estandarizada un electroencefalograma continuo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchivos de NeurocienciasSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207