MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391668587 · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2024.101353

Cerebellar imaging with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: approaches, challenges, and potential

2024· article· en· W4391668587 on OpenAlexafffund
Henrik Lundell, Christopher J. Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Research CouncilHorizon 2020Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionCanada Foundation for InnovationHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsDiffusion MRIWhite matterMagnetic resonance imagingCerebellumNeuroscienceComputer scienceTractographyDiffusion imagingMedicinePsychologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) is sensitive to the mobility of water in tissue and sensitive to cell geometry and organization in the central nervous system — providing unique insight into both local microstructure and white matter connectivity. Most dMRI methods were developed for studying cerebral white matter but can provide useful information about cerebellar white and gray matter. However, the small size and intricate structure of the cerebellum poses challenges for dMRI. In this review, we discuss these challenges, recent advancements in methodology, and insights from cerebellar applications of novel dMRI methods. While many limitations still remain and should be considered in conclusions regarding microstructure and connectivity, carefully designed experiments and analyses can provide new insight into behavioral and pathological aspects of cerebellar structure and function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.221
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Behavioral SciencesSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207