Tracing Detrital Epidote Derived from Alteration Halos to Porphyry Cu Deposits in Glaciated Terrains: The Search for Covered Mineralization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Distal alteration related to porphyry Cu mineralization is typically characterized by an abundance of green minerals, such as epidote, tremolite, and chlorite, within the propylitic and sodic-calcic alteration zones and extends far outside (>1 km) the mineralized zone(s). Glacial erosion and dispersal derived from rocks affected by propylitic and sodic-calcic alteration have resulted in the development of extensive dispersal trains of epidote in till (glacial sediment) that can reach 8 to 330 km2 as observed at four porphyry Cu study sites in the Quesnel terrane of south-central British Columbia: Highland Valley Copper, Gibraltar, Mount Polley, and Woodjam deposits. At each of these sites, epidote is more abundant in heavy mineral concentrates of till collected directly over and down-ice from mineralization and associated alteration. Epidote grains in till with >0.6 ppm Sb and >8 ppm As (as determined by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry) are attributed to a porphyry alteration provenance. There is a greater abundance of epidote grains with high concentrations of trace elements (>12 ppm Cu, >2,700 ppm Mn, >7 ppm Zn, and >37 ppm Pb) in each porphyry district compared to background regions. This trace element signature recorded in till epidote grains is heterogeneously distributed in these districts and is interpreted to reflect varying degrees of metal enrichment from a porphyry fluid source. Tracing the source of the epidote in the till (i.e., geochemically tying it to porphyry-related propylitic and/or sodic-calcic alteration), coupled with porphyry vectoring tools in bedrock, will aid in the detection of concealed porphyry Cu mineralization in glaciated terrains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".