Microscale Surface Defects Influence on Thermally Sprayed Alumina Droplets Deformation and Splashing Dynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract During plasma spraying, interaction between splats and surface microsized features can be critical to the splat dynamic progress and consequently to the coating microstructural development and interfacial bonding. The transient spreading of molten alumina impacting a flat substrate exhibiting micro-obstructions, commonly produced during surface machining, grinding and/or even polishing, is numerically investigated using a three-dimensional model comprising of splat solidification and shrinkage developments. Single isolated splats are also experimentally characterized using top surface scanning electron microscope analysis. Droplets impacting directly onto a microsized surface protuberance show no signs of premature splashing behavior. The microscopic features (<2.5 μm) are not able to generate flow instabilities to initially affect the splat inherent overall spreading. However, subsequent splat peripheral contact with target surface micro-obstructions, characterized by peak and valley features, induces peripheral lift, waviness, and instability. It follows that the ejected destabilized material shears/fractures during stretching triggering the formation of splash fingers. Solidification plays a major role in detracting the role of surface micro-obstructions, i.e., surface roughness, in splashing phenomena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it