MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391682240 · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00693

Structural Analysis of Single-Atom Catalysts by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

2024· article· en· W4391682240 on OpenAlexafffund
Ziyi Chen, Andrew G. Walsh, Peng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAccounts of Chemical Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsExtended X-ray absorption fine structureXANESX-ray absorption spectroscopySubatomic particleAbsorption (acoustics)Absorption spectroscopyX-ray absorption fine structureChemistryAtom (system on chip)Coordination numberSpectroscopyMaterials scienceCrystallographyOpticsPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conspectus Metal nanoparticles (NPs) are one of the most frequently used heterogeneous catalysts. However, only the surface atoms in the NPs can participate in catalytic reactions. To maximize the atomic efficiency, the active sites can be reduced to single atoms. Generally, catalysts that have isolated metal atoms on the surface of a support are called single-atom catalysts (SACs). Many techniques have been developed and applied to probe the structures of SACs. Nevertheless, the structural characterization of SACs is still challenging as it requires the analysis of their structure and properties with atomic and sometimes even subatomic resolution. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a powerful tool in investigating the local coordination environment of SACs since it is element-specific and can provide accurate structural information at the subatomic level (∼0.01 Å). In this Account, we present our perspectives on the structural analysis of SACs from some unique features in the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). We first highlight the importance of the XANES peak features in the sensitive analysis of SAC structures. Such analysis is illustrated to be even more useful in the joint applications of experimental and theoretical XAS. The inspection of the metal–metal (M-M) peak in Fourier transformed EXAFS (FT-EXAFS) spectra is a widely used method to identify the single-atom structure, but this method is not always reliable. Thus, we point out the importance of fitting EXAFS and the thorough interpretation of structural parameters such as coordination numbers (CNs, the number of neighboring atoms next to a chosen atom), bond distances, and the Debye–Waller factor (σ 2 ). The small FT-EXAFS peak for the M-M shell is often ignored in the structural analysis of SACs. Here, it is demonstrated that a careful analysis of these small peaks could help more reliably analyze the SAC structure, and it would be particularly useful in the analysis of a single-atom alloy (SAA). Next, the usefulness of bond distance and σ 2 analysis is highlighted, and such analysis is shown to be particularly helpful for the analysis of SAAs, which is rarely discussed in the literature. Given the advantage that XAS data can be collected under various conditions, we show that in situ XAS can provide important information about the catalytic mechanism of the SAC catalyst. In particular, we emphasize the significance of using an advanced in situ technique to extract detailed structural information that is difficult to obtain from regular XAS experiments. Finally, we highlight the importance of jointly using XAS with other complementary methods in a more complete understanding of the structure and properties of SACs. It is anticipated that with further development of XAS techniques and improved data analysis, XAS will become even more powerful in providing insights into the structure–property relationships of SACs, which can advance their practical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAccounts of Chemical ResearchSame topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207