MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391682351 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-g4vxk

Alkene-Coordinated Palladium(0) Cross-Coupling Precatalysts: Comparing Oxidative Addition and Catalytic Reactivity for Dimethyl Fumarate and Maleic Anhydride Stabilizing Ligands

2024· preprint· en· W4391682351 on OpenAlexafffund
Gilian T. Thomas, Jared Z. Litman, Binh Dang Ho, Jingjun Huang, Kalina Blonska, Nathan D. Schley, David C. Leitch

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsPalladiumChemistryMaleic anhydrideDenticityBorylationAlkeneOxidative additionCatalysisHeck reactionSuzuki reactionPhosphineCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryCyclooctadieneLigand (biochemistry)Medicinal chemistryPolymer chemistryArylAlkylMetalPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air-stable palladium (0) precatalysts are advantageous for facilitating a variety of chemical transformations, and are desir-able precursors for high-throughput experimentation studies. We report investigations into air-stable Pd(0) precatalysts stabi-lized by dimethyl fumarate (DMFU) as an electron-deficient alkene. A Pd(0) DMFU complex with a diazabutadiene (DAB) supporting ligand readily undergoes substitution with both monodentate and bidentate phosphines to form phosphine–Pd–DMFU complexes in situ. These complexes undergo oxidative addition with ArBr substrates, and are also effective precata-lysts for Heck coupling, Suzuki-Miyaura coupling, and Miyaura borylation. Catalytic comparisons of the DAB–Pd–DMFU precursor to other Pd sources reveals benefits and limitations of this system, including high activity in Heck coupling, and challenges with in situ catalyst generation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207