Stachy in jenipapeiro: effect of season and regulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The jenicrop stands out as a plant species of significant importance due to its medicinal, cultural and economic properties, so it is relevant to verify the capacity of vegetative propagation through the technique of cuttlefish, to optimize the commercial production and conservation of this plant. The project consisted of evaluating the viability of vegetative propagation by means of staking of the species Genipa americana (jenicrop), in different seasons of the year (winter and summer), using five doses of synthetic auxin, in the form of indole butyric acid (AIB): 0, 2000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 mg/L. The cuttings were made and kept in a mist chamber and evaluated after 60 days for rooting (number and length of roots), calleying, survival and bud formation. No stakes took root in both seasons; survival averaged 38% in summer and 61% in winter. In calejamento the averages were 10% in summer and 4.50% in winter. In the sprouting, 17.50% of the cuttings made in the summer sprouted, while none sprouted in the winter. A joint analysis was carried out and there was significant interaction between doses and seasons for calming, sprouting and survival; greater physiological activity can be noted in the summer, with sprouting and increased presence of calluses, while in the winter, there was no sprouting and less presence of calluses, but there was greater survival of the cuttings. Binomial regression analyzes were performed, where only the calejamento interaction and doses obtained significance; in this it was possible to observe that lower doses of AIB are correlated with higher presence of calluses. The vegetative multiplication of the genipap by cuttings was not possible; the use of AIB in the doses used had a negative effect; the seasons of the year affect directly on the cuttings, summer being the recommended period for collecting the cuttings
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".