Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Language has often been associated with the political culture of citizens and certain core values and expectations in multilingual federations. In times of crisis, the existence and extent of cultural characteristics are particularly relevant for multilingual societies, where cultural differences can fuel political conflict as much as similarities can bring people together. To answer whether and how language is associated with different political attitudes, this article analyses a cross-sectional survey of 7600 citizens in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Switzerland, and the United States. We find that some attitudes toward governance are indeed correlated with language, despite different nation-state contexts. In particular, French-speakers have different preferences for territorial centralization, while the governance attitudes of English-speakers are almost indistinguishable across countries. These findings allow us to refine and reconcile two common assumptions in the literature: that linguistic diversity leads to heterogeneous policy preferences, and that national integration masks cultural differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it