Guest Editorial: Artificial intelligence‐empowered reliable forecasting for energy sectors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this Special Issue, we have received 16 papers that have been subjected to peer-review.Of the 16 originally submitted papers, 7 papers have been accepted, which were of high quality and have contributed to the success of this Special Issue.In turn, 9 papers have been rejected, withdrawn, or referred to other related journals.The accepted papers address the following key areas: 'A Hybrid Prediction Method for Short-Term Load Based on Temporal Convolutional Networks and AttentionalMechanisms': This paper proposes a new short-term power load hybrid forecasting model, called channel enhanced attention (CEA) and temporal convolutional network (TCN) based transformer comprehensive forecasting model.This method combines the short-term feature extraction ability of TCN with
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".