MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391691529 · doi:10.1002/mop.34072

A segmented periodic slot array leaky‐wave antenna for beamforming applications

2024· article· en· W4391691529 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed K. Emara, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingBroadsideLeaky wave antennaStopbandAcousticsOpticsPropagation constantMain lobeTransverse planeReflection (computer programming)Slot antennaSlotted waveguideWaveguideAntenna (radio)Side lobeAntenna arrayPhysicsComputer scienceDipole antennaEngineeringTelecommunicationsMicrostrip antennaResonator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A segmented periodic slot array leaky‐wave antenna (LWA) is proposed for beamforming applications. The LWA consists of segments, each with a unique propagation constant achieved through varying periodicity and slot size. By using segments with different propagation constants, the proposed LWA can achieve beamforming such as flat‐top beams and side‐lobe level (SLL) reduction. The LWA is based on a substrate‐integrated waveguide with periodic double transverse slots in the broad wall of the waveguide. The double slots allow for reflection‐canceling to suppress the broadside stopband and hence can achieve beamforming capabilities in the backward, broadside, and forward directions. Full‐wave simulations are used to demonstrate the proposed concept for flat‐top beamforming in the mm‐wave band at 30 GHz. Experimental demonstration is conducted using two prototypes for flat‐top beams and SLL reduction, with good agreement with full‐wave simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrowave and Optical Technology LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207