MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391691624 · doi:10.5194/ejm-36-183-2024

Mckelveyite group minerals – Part 3: Bainbridgeite-(YCe), Na<sub>2</sub>Ba<sub>2</sub>YCe(CO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>6</sub>  ⋅  3H<sub>2</sub>O, a new species from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Canada

2024· article· en· W4391691624 on OpenAlexaffabout
Inna S. Lykova, Ralph Rowe, Glenn Poirier, Henrik Friis, Kate Helwig

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mineralogy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)CrystallographyX-ray crystallographyMineralogyChemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsDiffraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The new mckelveyite group mineral bainbridgeite-(YCe), ideally Na2Ba2YCe(CO3)6 ⋅ 3H2O, was found at Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada. Bainbridgeite-(YCe) occurs as pseudotrigonal and pseudohexagonal hemimorphic crystals that show platy, columnar, tabular, cone-shaped, barrel-shaped, saucer-shaped, or spindle-shaped habit. They often form stacked or parallel growth aggregates, rosettes, and groups of radiating crystals. The crystals are usually less than 1 mm in size. Bainbridgeite-(YCe) varies in colour from pale yellow to yellow, grey to almost black, bluish grey, green-grey, or white. The streak is white; the lustre is vitreous. The mineral has no cleavage. The Mohs hardness is 3. Dcalc is 3.49 g cm−3. Bainbridgeite-(YCe) is optically biaxial (+), α= 1.572(2), β= 1.586(2), γ= 1.628(2), 2 V (calc.) = 62∘, 2 V (meas.) = 45(4)∘(589 nm). The IR spectrum is reported. The composition (wt %, average of five analyses) is Na2O 6.86, CaO 0.59, SrO 4.01, BaO 25.71, Y2O3 8.24, La2O3 4.96, Ce2O3 8.38, Pr2O3 0.48, Nd2O3 1.87, Sm2O3 0.23, Gd2O3 0.67, Tb2O3 0.07, Dy2O3 1.38, Ho2O3 0.32, Er2O3 0.94, Tm2O3 0.08, Yb2O3 0.49, CO2 27.03, H2O 5.67, total 97.98. The empirical formula of the holotype calculated on the basis of six cations is as follows: Na2.11Ca0.10Sr0.37Ba1.60Y0.70La0.29Ce0.49Pr0.03Nd0.11Sm0.01Gd0.03Dy0.07Ho0.02Er0.05 Yb0.02(CO3)5.86(H2O)3.00. The mineral is triclinic, P1, a= 9.1079(2) Å, b= 9.1066(3) Å, c= 6.9332(2) Å, α= 102.861(2)∘, β= 116.148(2)∘, γ= 60.181(2)∘, V= 447.85(2) Å3, and Z= 1. The strongest reflections of the powder X-ray diffraction pattern [d,Å(I)(hkl)] are 6.22(42)(001, 1‾1‾1, 1‾01), 4.430(100)(01‾1, 2‾1‾1, 120), 4.094(37)(1‾2‾1, 1‾11, 210, 111), 3.263(26)(11‾1, 2‾1‾2, 121), 2.888(67)(1‾2‾2, 1‾12, 211), 2.633(38)(3‾01, 030, 3‾3‾1), 2.263(23)(2‾21, 2‾4‾1, 4‾2‾1). 2.010(20)(03‾2, 3‾3‾3, 3‾03, 301, 032, 331). The crystal structure, solved and refined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data (R1= 0.040), is of the weloganite type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of MineralogySame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207