Multi-genome synteny detection using minimizer graph mappings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In recent years, the landscape of reference-grade genome assemblies has seen substantial diversification. With such rich data, there is pressing demand for robust tools for scalable, multi-species comparative genomics analyses, including detecting genome synteny, which informs on the sequence conservation between genomes and contributes crucial insights into species evolution. Here, we introduce ntSynt, a scalable utility for computing large-scale multi-genome synteny blocks using a minimizer graph-based approach. Through extensive testing utilizing multiple ∼3 Gbp genomes, we demonstrate how ntSynt produces synteny blocks with coverages between 79–100% in at most 2h using 34 GB of memory, even for genomes with appreciable (>15%) sequence divergence. Compared to existing state-of-the-art methodologies, ntSynt offers enhanced flexibility to diverse input genome sequences and synteny block granularity. We expect the macrosyntenic genome analyses facilitated by ntSynt will have broad utility in generating critical evolutionary insights within and between species across the tree of life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".