MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391702344 · doi:10.1353/wic.2021.a919167

Editor's Commentary

2021· article· tl· W4391702344 on OpenAlex
Lloyd L. Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWicazo Sa Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languagetl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPsychoanalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editor's Commentary Lloyd L. Lee (bio) Yá'át'ééh! I hope everyone is doing well. Volume 36, number 2 is an important edition with four articles, four book reviews, and eleven tribute reflection essays honoring the life and impact of one of the journal's founders, Elizabeth Cook-Lynn. This edition focuses on a variety of topics and shares insightful book reviews. On July 5, 2023, one of the journal's founding editors, Elizabeth Cook-Lynn, passed to the spirit world. We want to honor her life and the impact she made on so many educators, scholars, and Indigenous peoples. We sent out a call for reflection essays in September 2023 and asked scholars, researchers, activists, writers, and community members to reflect upon the profound influence of Cook-Lynn's research, writing, teaching, activism, career, and personal lives. This issue contains a total of eleven tribute reflection essays, but it is only a glimpse into Cook-Lynn's life and influence. The reflection essays show the personal connections each of the individuals had with Elizabeth Cook-Lynn and the enormous influence and impact she will continue to have with regard to the discipline, Indigenous communities, and Native Nations. This journal would not exist without Cook-Lynn's vision, hard work, and strength to build and mature the field of American Indian/Native American studies. We know the journal will continue to honor her legacy and advance American Indian/Native American studies. The first article, Kerri J. Malloy's "California Genocide: A Historiography of Settler Innocence," examines settler-colonial impetus for anti-Indigenous violence at the state, regional, and tribal [End Page v] levels. This article promotes a settler-colonial analytic to interrogate settler colonialism in California and the genocide of Indigenous peoples. Malloy advocates for further scholarly inquiry and case studies to provide context and illuminate the settler-colonial framework. The second article, "Mapping Tahlequah History: A Collaboration to Learn and Teach about Cherokee Places in Northeastern Oklahoma," by Dave Corcoran, Farina King, Justin T. McBride, and John McIntosh, began as a roundtable at the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the American Indian Studies Association in February 2023 at Arizona State University. The article describes a mapping project where students worked with communities to create narratives to help the public better understand the layers of history surrounding the diverse populations of Tahlequah and the region of Green Country in northeastern Oklahoma. The region is home to the Cherokee Nation and the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokees. This piece focuses on a region of Oklahoma where Indigenizing mapping and collaborating among Native and non-Native communities and peoples occurs. The third article, "SING 2019 Talking Circle: Indigenous Perspectives on Chronic Wasting Disease Research and Management in North America," by Arlana M. Redsky, Latiya Northwest, Ashlyn Jensen-Fisk, Tanelle Smith, Katie Neimeyer, Avery Newman-Simmons, Chyloe Healy, Morgan Hyrcak, Jenna Burke, Khalyd Clay, Warren Cardinal-McTeague, Naomí Carriere, John Turn, K'alii Stewart, and Elder Grace Cook, is about the Summer internship for Indigenous peoples in Genomics (SING) Canada training program held at the University of Alberta in Edmonton in 2019. Indigenous students, nation members, Elders, and early career Indigenous scientists came together to participate in an intensive training program on chronic wasting disease (CWD) of cervids (deer, moose, elk, and caribou). The participants came together to demonstrate the greater needs for Indigenous engagement and consultation on CWD and the inclusion of comprehensive Indigenous perspectives emphasizing interconnection between living and non-living beings. The fourth article, "Raven Evades the Anthropocene: Whiteness, Indigeneity, and Environmental Disaster," by Aandax̱joon Sabena Allen, explores Lingít (Tlingit) Raven stories and their ability to undermine Anthropocene logics. The narratives illustrate long-standing Lingít means of dealing with catastrophe still valuable in the present. The article makes the case that Indigenous narratives exceed Anthropocene thinking and represent a more generative framework in considering climate change. Along with the four articles, four book reviews are a part of this issue. The books reviewed are This Contested Land: The Storied Past and Uncertain Future of America's National Monuments (2022), by [End Page vi] McKenzie Long, reviewed by Annabel G. LaBrecque; Seven Aunts (2022), by Staci Lola...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.235
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it