MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391717378 · doi:10.1353/esc.2021.a919364

Introduction: Lacan Now

2021· article· en· W4391717378 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Concetta V. Principe

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoanalysisLiteraturePhilosophyArtPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Lacan Now Concetta Principe (bio) I recently completed editing a collection of articles on Lacan’s Écrits “Science and Truth.” While that project had a very clear focus, a single Lacanian text, very different from this project which was an open call, that project and this project show some striking similarities that I would argue indicate a “now” in Lacanian scholarship. Themes such as psychosis, Marxism and capital, and racism evident in the Science and Truth project are also here in this special issue of English Studies in Canada. There are differences of course, the most striking being that these articles are reading Lacan very broadly, drawing on a large body of scholarship on social and political theory to make their argument. Moreover, these articles are written predominantly by Canadian scholars. And there are two autotheory projects (Kuitenbrouwer and Soros) that I am very happy to be including. In its migration from the clinic to political and cultural analysis, Lacanian thought has contributed much to understanding contemporary political and cultural phenomena. And it all started with the “unconscious.” What Freud had initiated in his scientific inquiry of irrational behaviour and the talking cure, Lacan evolved into a more dynamic project of the impossible truth that reveals so much about the modern subject. That is, [End Page 1] for Lacan the cure is secondary to the process experienced by the analy-sand who, in listening to her unconscious speak, is lead to her particular and incomplete truth. Whereas Freud saw the irrational of the unconscious as a path of resistance, Lacan saw the path of the unconscious to the truth as a mobius strip, running along the path of the lie. Why do we behave against reason? Well, when we follow the unconscious through the bracken, thorns, and forest of our confusion, we come upon an understanding of the self. That is, the unconscious is no longer a conflicted alien element of the self but the part that is the most compassionate and caring. This project of the analysand’s work, her truth, is enabled by what Lacan promotes as the analyst’s refusal to be the “one supposed to know.” The labile quality of words, the analysand’s unconscious, and human interest in understanding perhaps together explain how Lacanian thought managed to move beyond the clinic and become a tool for understanding socio-political and cultural phenomena. There was the minor failure of psychoanalytic application in film analysis in the 1970s that did not diminish the great success of the application to political thinking made possible by Althusser’s project on Marxist ideology. This political work became the ground for first generation Lacanianists such as Alain Badiou and his Being and Event, as well as Slavoj Žižek and his The Sublime Object of Ideology and Joan Copjec’s Read My Desire. Copjec took an interest in Lacan’s sexuation paradigm, where the feminine position, or ethics and woman in Lacanian terms, are not biologically determined but extra-lingual. Much of this work grounds Allan Pero’s article in this special issue. The second wave of Lacanians like Todd McGowan, Adrian Johnson, Richard Boothby, Derek Hook, Callum Neill, Stijn Vanheule, Matthew Flisfeder, Clint Burnham, and Duane Rousselle—the latter two of whom have papers in this issue—Patricia Gherovici, Alenka Zupančič, Mladen Dolar, and George Sheldon, as well as the late Mary Ruti, ground much of the scholarship in this issue. They have pushed the envelope on how we can apply Lacan, inspiring the spread of his thought into diverse and specialized fields on issues as varied as racism, sexuation, extractivism, addiction, and psychosis. Lacanian thought is increasingly global in its scope and impact. Communities as far from us as Australia, the long-standing communities in Ireland, England, France, United States, Scotland, South America, Central America, and the transatlantic/transpacific dialogues happening at the global level confirm that Lacanian thought is a vital contribution to contemporary scholarship, acting in the spirit that Lacan encouraged: since we know our desires will never fully reveal themselves, we can finally throw [End Page 2] up our hands and stop pretending to have everything under control. This is the spirit with which...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicPsychoanalysis, Philosophy, and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207