MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4391726970 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae395

AT2020ohl: its nature and probable implications

2024· article· en· W4391726970 on OpenAlexfundno aff
R. Roy, Samir Mandal, D. K. Sahu, G. C. Anupama, S. Nandi, Brijesh Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAstrophysics DivisionLeibniz-GemeinschaftSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderJet Propulsion LaboratoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieNew Mexico State UniversityNanjing UniversityYale UniversityUniversity of TorontoÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionScience and Engineering Research BoardYunnan UniversityNational Science FoundationChina National Textile and Apparel CouncilCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomyStatistical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT ASASSN-20hx, a.k.a AT2020ohl, is an ambiguous nuclear transient, which was discovered in the nearby galaxy NGC6297 by the All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae. We have investigated the evolution of AT2020ohl using a multiwavelength data set to explain the geometry of the system and the energy radiated by it between X-ray and radio wavelengths. Our X-ray, UV/optical, and radio observations of the object jointly clarify the association of AT2020ohl with the nuclear activity of NGC6297. We detected radio counterpart of AT2020ohl 111 and 313 d after the discovery in Jansky Very Large Array X-band with flux densities 47 ± 14 and 34 ± 3 $\mu$Jy, respectively. Using multiwavelength data analysis, we nullify the possibility of associating any stellar disruption process with this event. We found some evidence showing that the host galaxy is a merger remnant, so the possibility of a binary supermassive black hole (SMBH) system cannot be ruled out. The central SMBH has a mass of ∼1.2 × 107 M⊙. We propose the accretion disc activity as the origin of AT2020ohl – it is either due to disc accretion event on to the central SMBH or due to the sudden accretion activity in a pre-existing accretion disc of the system during the interaction of two SMBHs which became gravitationally bound during a merger process. However, we also admit that with the existing data set, it is impossible to say definitively, among these two probabilities, which one is the origin of this nuclear transient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae→French-language works237,207→