Add-on Sodium Benzoate and <i>N</i>-Acetylcysteine in Patients With Early Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Placebo-Controlled Feasibility Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Hypothesis: -acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to improve negative symptoms of schizophrenia, however, results from trials of other compounds targeting NMDA neurotransmission have been mixed. This may reflect poor target engagement but also that risk mechanisms act in parallel. Sodium Benzoate (NaB) could have an additive with NAC to act on several pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in schizophrenia. Study Design: A multicenter, 12 weeks, 2 × 2 factorial design, randomized double-blind placebo-controlled feasibility trial of NaB and NAC added to standard treatment in 68 adults with early schizophrenia. Primary feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, and completion of assessments as well as acceptability of the study interventions. Psychosis symptoms, functioning, and cognitive assessments were also assessed. Study Results: = 53) at 12 weeks, supporting the feasibility of recruitment and retention. There were no difficulties in completing clinical outcome schedules. Medications were well tolerated with no dropouts due to side effects. This study was not powered to detect clinical effect and as expected no main effects were found on the majority of clinical outcomes. Conclusions: We demonstrated feasibility of conducting a clinical trial of NaB and NAC. Given the preliminary nature of this study, we cannot draw firm conclusions about the clinical efficacy of either agent, and a large-scale trial is needed to examine if significant differences between treatment groups emerge. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03510741.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Randomized trial | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Randomized trial | high |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".