Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dreams: insularity, continuity, and disjunctureWhen I delivered my first lecture on psychoanalysis and artificial intelligence, I opened with an equivocation: I thanked the audience for "beinghere, " which was a forced equivocation, a homophony, with "being-hear." When the phrase is said aloud it demonstrates how an equivocation can accommodate a resonance through speech (although not the written word), whose sounds permit something to shift outside of its dwelling place, language.In other words, the equivocation opens us up to an enjoyment that exists outside of the domain of what philosophers have called "being."I offered another equivocation, but of a different order: "the interpretation of dreams." It was the title of a well-known book which was written by Sigmund Freud and published in 1899.The title permits an alternative reading: the interpretation of dreams.On the one hand, it implies that interpretation involves deciphering latent dream thoughts from manifest dream statements.On the other hand, the interpretation of dreams implies that the dream is its own interpretation, since it proceeds according to condensation and displacement, or, put in linguistic terms, metaphor and metonymy (see Miller, "Interpretation in Reverse").
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it