Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jacques lacan ended Seminar XIX , … Or Worse, with an unexpected warning: "Since, nevertheless, it's not just about painting a rosetinted future, you should know that what is on the rise, the ultimate consequences of which we have still not seen, and which is rooted in the body, in the fraternity of bodies, is racism.You have not heard the last of this."The audience had, however, heard the last of this.Seminar XIX was suddenly over, and Lacan did not return to the topic in later seminars.He would, though, make a couple of further comments on racism over the following six months, first in the enigmatic essay "L'étourdit" and then as part of his television special of January 1973, the text of which would eventually be published as Television.It is hard to pinpoint the tone of the concluding remark.The two sentences seem to serve all at once as a warning, threat, aside, mic drop, and cliffhanger.It was a bit of a non sequitur, as Seminar XIX had not led anyone to expect a warning about racism.Lacan had made no mention of racism up to that point, and it had not often been among his preoccupations, although he had at times over the years spoken out against segregation (Khan 149-50).Lacan began the final session by signaling that he would be taking a new direction that day: "summing myself up, as they Racism, Or … Worse: On the end of Lacan's Seminar XIX
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".