MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391740027 · doi:10.24874/ijqr18.01-04

VALIDATING IoT-RELATED ISO 10001 HAND HYGIENE PRIVACY CODES IN HEALTHCARE

2024· article· en· W4391740027 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
María Belén Ortiz, Stanislav Karapetrović

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Quality Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicQuality and Safety in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsHygieneHealth careInternet of ThingsInternet privacyComputer securityComputer scienceBusinessMedicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Six Healthcare Workers' Hand Hygiene Privacy Codes (HW-HH-PCs), addressing data collected through an automated HH Monitoring Technology (HHMT), are validated.These HW-HH-PCs illustrate integrative augmentation with ISO 10001:2018 customer satisfaction and ISO/IEC 27701:2019 privacy management standards.A focus group of infection preventionists, managers and technology specialists from a Canadian hospital was conducted to verify the HW-HH-PCs' feasibility.An electronic survey and personal interviews with HWs from the hospital were then performed to evaluate the perceived importance of the three feasible and additional HW-HH-PCs.HWs recognized the feasible codes as important and reported feeling more comfortable with the automated HHMT if they were to be established.This paper may be the first to present empirical data about the feasibility and perceived importance of privacy-related codes that follow ISO 10001 and ISO/IEC 27701 guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.505
GPT teacher head0.675
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Quality ResearchSame topicQuality and Safety in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207