MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391740578 · doi:10.32920/25209566.v1

Isolation within the Black and/or Caribbean Community: Implications of Identity, Cultural Transference, and Belonging

2024· preprint· en· W4391740578 on OpenAlexaffabout
Toni-Ann Honeywell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRacial and Ethnic Identity Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsolation (microbiology)Identity (music)RacismSociologyGender studiesNarrativeQualitative researchColonialismPerspective (graphical)Race (biology)ImmigrationSettlement (finance)Grounded theoryEthnic groupPolitical scienceAnthropologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this study is to examine and highlight experiences of isolation among Black and/or Caribbean first-generation immigrants in the GTA. It seeks to explore how this community experiences isolation, and how they navigate culture, belonging, and identity. This is a qualitative research study that involved one-on-one interviews with three participants using semi-structured interviews. The study used a narrative methodology. This methodology enabled the exploration of the participants’ experiences through stories, and their lived experiences. Critical Race Theory and Anti-Colonialism Theory were used to analyze literature and findings. These frameworks will highlight the implications of race, and its influence in the experiences of people from the Black and/or Caribbean community. This study hopes to offer a unique perspective on the importance of community and culture in dealing with racism, and settlement within Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0290.017
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.010
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchFrench-language works237,207