MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391742335 · doi:10.47611/jsrhs.v12i3.4961

Binaural Techniques, Functionality, and Applications: A Literature Review

2023· review· en· W4391742335 on OpenAlexaff
Sophia Wang, Julie Stoyka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Research · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBinaural recordingComputer scienceSpeech recognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binaural techniques, the use of audio differences in the left and right audio channels, have been used with varying frequency over the past few decades. The main advantage of binaural techniques lies in how they create a sense of spaciousness and invoke specific audio scenes. This paper conducts a literature review about the studies surrounding recent binaural techniques and their functionality, as well as possible applications in the field of psychology. A dearth of research regarding recent binaural techniques was identified in the process of conducting the research for this literature review. Several opportunities for future research have been suggested, such as the use of binaural techniques across the vertical plane and evaluating the perception of sound and spatial scenes among the general public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.804
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.355
GPT teacher head0.566
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Student ResearchSame topicNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesFrench-language works237,207