MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391744134 · doi:10.1103/physreva.109.023110

Multi-sideband interference structures by high-order photon-induced continuum-continuum transitions in helium

2024· article· en· W4391744134 on OpenAlexafffund
Divya Bharti, Hemkumar Srinivas, Farshad Shobeiry, Aaron Bondy, Soumyajit Saha, Kathryn R. Hamilton, R. Moshammer, Thomas Pfeifer, Klaus Bartschat, Anne Harth

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInternational Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems EngineeringDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSidebandPhysicsHeliumInterference (communication)PhotonAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsTelecommunicationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following up on a previous paper on two-color photoionization of <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mrow><a:mi>Ar</a:mi><a:mo>(</a:mo><a:mn>3</a:mn><a:mi>p</a:mi><a:mo>)</a:mo></a:mrow></a:math> [D. Bharti , ], we present measurements and calculations for a modified three-sideband (3-SB) version of the reconstruction of attosecond beating by interference of two-photon transitions (RABBITT) configuration applied to <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:mrow><b:mi>He</b:mi><b:mo>(</b:mo><b:mn>1</b:mn><b:mi>s</b:mi><b:mo>)</b:mo></b:mrow></b:math>. The 3-SB RABBITT approach allows us to explore interference effects between pathways involving different orders of transitions within the continuum. The relative differences in the retrieved oscillation phases of the three sidebands provide insights into the continuum-continuum transitions. The ground state of helium has zero orbital angular momentum, which simplifies the analysis of oscillation phases and their angle dependence within the three sidebands. We find qualitative agreement between our experimental results and the theoretical predictions for many cases but also observe some significant quantitative discrepancies. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207