MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391745737 · doi:10.1111/1467-9809.13025

Lloyd D.Barba, Andrea ShanJohnson, and DanielRamírez, eds.: Oneness Pentecostalism: Race, Gender, and Culture. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2023; pp. xvii +263.

2024· article· en· W4391745737 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Religious History · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegentState (computer science)SociologyLibrary scienceMedia studiesArt historyTheologyHistoryPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Oneness Pentecostal movement has long stood on the periphery of American religious history scholarship. Only recently have academic studies begun to seriously consider the contribution of Oneness groups to the landscape of global religion. This work, edited by Lloyd D. Barba, Andrea Shan Johnson, and Daniel Ramírez, assesses the history of North American Oneness peoples in view of the issues of ethnicity, race, class, and gender. Today, Oneness (also referred to as “Apostolic” or “Jesus Only”) groups encompass hundreds of denominations worldwide, with dozens spread across the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Oneness Pentecostalism engages this significant, albeit largely marginalized, movement's core ideas, figures, arguments, and misinterpretations. Alongside its overarching historical focus, the book's ten essays span the disciplines of anthropology, theology, and architectural studies. It begins with several contributions focusing on the movement from a historical theological framework. Chapter 1 is an essay by Manuel Gaxiola, a theologian who served as the presiding bishop of Mexico's flagship Oneness denomination, the Iglesia Apostólica de la Fe en Cristo Jesús. Among the first Latin American Pentecostals to earn a doctoral degree, Gaxiola maintains that the movement's immense growth implies that other Pentecostals can no longer dismiss it. David Reed traces the roots of Oneness Pentecostalism vis-à-vis its ties to prior evangelical beliefs and practices (Chapter 2). In Chapter 3, Ramírez explores the movement's hymnody, illuminating more popular expressions of its theology with a keen eye on Latino renditions. Daniel Segraves examines the theology of the Persian Oneness pioneer Andrew D. Urshan (Chapter 4). The following two chapters build on the movement's diverse origins, surveying how 1920s and 1930s migratory trends influenced the shaping and development of various Oneness churches. Barba evaluates how “Dust Bowl” migrants (out of the Western South) challenged the earlier, more sophisticated generation of Californian Pentecostals and Protestants. Particularly in the Central Valley region, Okie migrants established a reputation for their hard-liner culture of authority and confrontation amid the Great Depression. Rosa Sailes considers the multigenerational impact of the Brazier family on Chicago. Propelled by their Great Migration journey from the rural American South, the Braziers' holistic ministry reshaped the values of an urban African American community. The focus shifts in subsequent essays to the significance of gender in the movement's development. Dara Coleby Delgado explores the changing roles of women within the primarily African American Pentecostal Assemblies of the World (Chapter 7). Johnson examines how the movement's early female ministers (predominantly white) found a preaching niche in smaller congregations and on the missions field (Chapter 8). Patricia Fortuny assesses the contours of female membership in the transnational La Luz del Mundo, delineating the persistent range of Latina attitudes toward home and church life across three migrant generations in the United States (Chapter 9). In the final chapter, Daniel Chiquete elucidates how space, liturgy, and aesthetics symbolically depict the unique worship attributes of Apostolic Temples in Sinaloa, Mexico. Alongside its interdisciplinary scope, among the unique contributions of this book is its representation of the diversity of Oneness Pentecostalism. Enlarging the referent well beyond the movement's US origins, the work elaborates the breadth of its regional, ethnic, racial, gender, social, and theological reach. It portrays a robust movement with formidable Black, white, and Latino roots traversing national boundaries and the global North–South divide. It vividly depicts the movement's hitherto scarcely represented Mexican heritage. The chapters by Gaxiola, Ramírez, Fortuny, and Chiquete pay tribute to this Latino Apostolic dimension, constituting up to one-half of Mexican and Mexican American Pentecostals today. The essays frequently return to the unifying influence of the Black Oneness leader G. T. Haywood, who, perhaps more than any other early leader, perpetuated the interracial vision of the Azusa Street Pentecostal pioneer William J. Seymour. Haywood's denomination, the Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, maintained a racially integrated leadership board into the 1920s, clinging to its inclusive origins when most Pentecostal churches had already succumbed to Jim Crow segregation. The book's contribution to the gender debate offers critical insight into the complexity of female roles among Oneness groups today. The essays by Delgado, Johnson, and Fortuny explore female attitudes in a movement that has challenged traditional religious norms while often masking conventional stereotypes. Although a unifying standard eludes the women of the movement — some thrive in a more entrenched household setting while others press for enhanced space in the pulpit and leadership — the work provides an incontrovertible platform for these female voices to be heard. This book supplies a timely critique of typical homogonous renderings of Oneness history, preoccupied with white US perspectives and linear narratives confined to Arroyo Seco origins. Although the 1913 Arroyo Seco camp meeting figures prominently in the movement's history, this work uncovers similar paths tracing back elsewhere. The story of Romana Valenzuela, although crisscrossing Los Angeles, illuminates the central roles in the movement's narrative of her Mexican hometown and a Black El Paso Oneness church. Currents unique to these places combine in a receptivity to Jesus' name baptism, culminating in the beginnings of the Iglesia Apostólica in Villa Aldama, Chihuahua. The book also underscores theological roots reaching beyond the movement's usually asserted Finished Work mores. The chapters by Reed and Segraves highlight more nuanced origins encompassing aspects of Eastern Christian theology. In the work's conclusion, the editors observe how such “decentering” of Oneness origins invites consideration of other influences, including Wesleyan and Mexican Apostolic roots (p. 243). There is little to not recommend about this book. Although Canadian origins receive minimal attention, this gap may speak instead to the prodigiousness of the movement's US and Latino roots. To my knowledge, no work has offered such extensive insight into the Mexican mores of the movement. Oneness Pentecostalism will appeal to a range of scholars, including historians, alongside those interested in how the movement's narrative intersects the areas of theology, anthropology, and architecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it