MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4391745737 · doi:10.1111/1467-9809.13025

Lloyd D.Barba, Andrea ShanJohnson, and DanielRamírez, eds.: Oneness Pentecostalism: Race, Gender, and Culture. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2023; pp. xvii +263.

2024· article· en· W4391745737 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Religious History · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRegentState (computer science)SociologyLibrary scienceMedia studiesArt historyTheologyHistoryPhilosophyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Oneness Pentecostal movement has long stood on the periphery of American religious history scholarship. Only recently have academic studies begun to seriously consider the contribution of Oneness groups to the landscape of global religion. This work, edited by Lloyd D. Barba, Andrea Shan Johnson, and Daniel Ramírez, assesses the history of North American Oneness peoples in view of the issues of ethnicity, race, class, and gender. Today, Oneness (also referred to as “Apostolic” or “Jesus Only”) groups encompass hundreds of denominations worldwide, with dozens spread across the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Oneness Pentecostalism engages this significant, albeit largely marginalized, movement's core ideas, figures, arguments, and misinterpretations. Alongside its overarching historical focus, the book's ten essays span the disciplines of anthropology, theology, and architectural studies. It begins with several contributions focusing on the movement from a historical theological framework. Chapter 1 is an essay by Manuel Gaxiola, a theologian who served as the presiding bishop of Mexico's flagship Oneness denomination, the Iglesia Apostólica de la Fe en Cristo Jesús. Among the first Latin American Pentecostals to earn a doctoral degree, Gaxiola maintains that the movement's immense growth implies that other Pentecostals can no longer dismiss it. David Reed traces the roots of Oneness Pentecostalism vis-à-vis its ties to prior evangelical beliefs and practices (Chapter 2). In Chapter 3, Ramírez explores the movement's hymnody, illuminating more popular expressions of its theology with a keen eye on Latino renditions. Daniel Segraves examines the theology of the Persian Oneness pioneer Andrew D. Urshan (Chapter 4). The following two chapters build on the movement's diverse origins, surveying how 1920s and 1930s migratory trends influenced the shaping and development of various Oneness churches. Barba evaluates how “Dust Bowl” migrants (out of the Western South) challenged the earlier, more sophisticated generation of Californian Pentecostals and Protestants. Particularly in the Central Valley region, Okie migrants established a reputation for their hard-liner culture of authority and confrontation amid the Great Depression. Rosa Sailes considers the multigenerational impact of the Brazier family on Chicago. Propelled by their Great Migration journey from the rural American South, the Braziers' holistic ministry reshaped the values of an urban African American community. The focus shifts in subsequent essays to the significance of gender in the movement's development. Dara Coleby Delgado explores the changing roles of women within the primarily African American Pentecostal Assemblies of the World (Chapter 7). Johnson examines how the movement's early female ministers (predominantly white) found a preaching niche in smaller congregations and on the missions field (Chapter 8). Patricia Fortuny assesses the contours of female membership in the transnational La Luz del Mundo, delineating the persistent range of Latina attitudes toward home and church life across three migrant generations in the United States (Chapter 9). In the final chapter, Daniel Chiquete elucidates how space, liturgy, and aesthetics symbolically depict the unique worship attributes of Apostolic Temples in Sinaloa, Mexico. Alongside its interdisciplinary scope, among the unique contributions of this book is its representation of the diversity of Oneness Pentecostalism. Enlarging the referent well beyond the movement's US origins, the work elaborates the breadth of its regional, ethnic, racial, gender, social, and theological reach. It portrays a robust movement with formidable Black, white, and Latino roots traversing national boundaries and the global North–South divide. It vividly depicts the movement's hitherto scarcely represented Mexican heritage. The chapters by Gaxiola, Ramírez, Fortuny, and Chiquete pay tribute to this Latino Apostolic dimension, constituting up to one-half of Mexican and Mexican American Pentecostals today. The essays frequently return to the unifying influence of the Black Oneness leader G. T. Haywood, who, perhaps more than any other early leader, perpetuated the interracial vision of the Azusa Street Pentecostal pioneer William J. Seymour. Haywood's denomination, the Pentecostal Assemblies of the World, maintained a racially integrated leadership board into the 1920s, clinging to its inclusive origins when most Pentecostal churches had already succumbed to Jim Crow segregation. The book's contribution to the gender debate offers critical insight into the complexity of female roles among Oneness groups today. The essays by Delgado, Johnson, and Fortuny explore female attitudes in a movement that has challenged traditional religious norms while often masking conventional stereotypes. Although a unifying standard eludes the women of the movement — some thrive in a more entrenched household setting while others press for enhanced space in the pulpit and leadership — the work provides an incontrovertible platform for these female voices to be heard. This book supplies a timely critique of typical homogonous renderings of Oneness history, preoccupied with white US perspectives and linear narratives confined to Arroyo Seco origins. Although the 1913 Arroyo Seco camp meeting figures prominently in the movement's history, this work uncovers similar paths tracing back elsewhere. The story of Romana Valenzuela, although crisscrossing Los Angeles, illuminates the central roles in the movement's narrative of her Mexican hometown and a Black El Paso Oneness church. Currents unique to these places combine in a receptivity to Jesus' name baptism, culminating in the beginnings of the Iglesia Apostólica in Villa Aldama, Chihuahua. The book also underscores theological roots reaching beyond the movement's usually asserted Finished Work mores. The chapters by Reed and Segraves highlight more nuanced origins encompassing aspects of Eastern Christian theology. In the work's conclusion, the editors observe how such “decentering” of Oneness origins invites consideration of other influences, including Wesleyan and Mexican Apostolic roots (p. 243). There is little to not recommend about this book. Although Canadian origins receive minimal attention, this gap may speak instead to the prodigiousness of the movement's US and Latino roots. To my knowledge, no work has offered such extensive insight into the Mexican mores of the movement. Oneness Pentecostalism will appeal to a range of scholars, including historians, alongside those interested in how the movement's narrative intersects the areas of theology, anthropology, and architecture.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,141
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,186
Écart entre enseignants0,169 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle