Development of a non-uniform cellular automata framework for sizing, topology and layout optimization of truss structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a bi-level non-uniform cellular automata (CA) algorithm for the solution of sizing, topology and layout optimization of truss structures. The non-uniform CA was successfully used in a previous study to solve the weight optimization problem of truss structures for topology and sizing (El Bouzouiki, Sedaghati, and Stiharu 2021. Computers & Structures 242: 106394). In this article, an extended version of the non-uniform CA algorithm is proposed, based on the fully stressed design approach and the distribution of strain energy within the structure, to find the optimal position of the cell’s (joint’s) coordinates. The proposed non-uniform CA algorithm can solve the minimum weight optimization problem of truss structures subjected to both stress and displacement constraints. Several benchmark problems are presented to demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of the proposed methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it