Identifying Ferroptosis Inducers, HDAC, and RTK Inhibitor Sensitivity in Melanoma Subtypes through Unbiased Drug Target Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The utilization of PD1 and CTLA4 inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment of malignant melanoma (MM). However, resistance to targeted and immune-checkpoint-based therapies still poses a significant problem. Here we mine large scale MM proteogenomic data integrating it with MM cell line dependency screen, and drug sensitivity data to identify druggable targets and forecast treatment efficacy and resistance. Leveraging protein profiles from established MM subtypes and molecular structures of 82 cancer treatment drugs, we identified nine candidate hub proteins, mTOR, FYN, PIK3CB, EGFR, MAPK3, MAP4K1, MAP2K1, SRC and AKT1, across five distinct MM subtypes. These proteins serve as potential drug targets applicable to one or multiple MM subtypes. By analyzing transcriptomic data from 48 publicly accessible melanoma cell lines sourced from Achilles and CRISPR dependency screens, we forecasted 162 potentially targetable genes. We also identified genetic resistance in 260 genes across at least one melanoma subtype. In addition, we employed publicly available compound sensitivity data (Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal, CTRPv2) on the cell lines to assess the correlation of compound effectiveness within each subtype. We have identified 20 compounds exhibiting potential drug impact in at least one melanoma subtype. Remarkably, employing this unbiased approach, we have uncovered compounds targeting ferroptosis, that demonstrate a striking 30x fold difference in sensitivity among different subtypes. This implies that the proteogenomic classification of melanoma has the potential to predict sensitivity to ferroptosis compounds. Our results suggest innovative and novel therapeutic strategies by stratifying melanoma samples through proteomic profiling, offering a spectrum of novel therapeutic interventions and prospects for combination therapy. Highlights: (1) Proteogenomic subtype classification can define the landscape of genetic dependencies in melanoma (2) Nine proteins from molecular subtypes were identified as potential drug targets for specified MM patients (3) 20 compounds identified that show potential effectiveness in at least one melanoma subtype (4) Proteogenomics can predict specific ferroptosis inducers, HDAC, and RTK Inhibitor sensitivity in melanoma subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".