Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Western medical model of disability typically views disability through the lens of an individual's medical condition; disability is seen as a deviation from what is considered the 'normal' and which then needs to be medicalized and repaired (F.Shanouda, personal communication, October 2, 2023).My painting illustrates medical staff surrounding a person struggling to drag themselves across the floor as they reach out for help.If you look closely at the scrubs, you can see the sparkles in the paint, which represent how medical professionals tend to view themselves as experts on disabilities (F.Shanouda, personal communication, October 2, 2023).The blackness and sludge engulfing the two disabled people is an attempt to make physical the impact of the prejudice and ignorance, and the feelings of constantly having to navigate environments where you are viewed as an obstacle, something to be fixed.On the right side of the piece there is a person with disabilities reaching out to help but they cannot pass the line.Their sludge is somewhat lesser, but they remain stuck.My image animates a social model of disability in which disability is situated and understood in relation to systemic barriers and social exclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".