Complete Morphometry of Normal and Dysplastic Hip Joint in Large Breeds of Dogs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data on measurements of the proximal femur, acetabulum with special reference to CHD in large breed young dogs is relatively limited.The present study recorded complete morphometric of hip joint in healthy as well as dysplastic hip joint in large breed young dogs.Hip morphometrics were not significantly different between right and left limbs in normal hip joint or CHD in Doberman, Labrador, German shepherd and Rottweiler breeds.AA, EAA, DI, SI were significantly higher in CHD whereas HNI, AHI, PC, NA were higher in healthy hip joint in all the four breeds under study.Many proximal femoral and acetabular measurements were significantly different between male and female dogs.DI and SI were not significantly different between male and female dogs of Group I and II in Doberman, Labrador, German shepherd breeds.Many proximal femoral measurements and acetabular measurements were significantly different between unilateral and bilateral CHD.Other measurements like PC, NA, DI and SI were similar in unilateral and bilateral CHD in Doberman and Labrador breeds..
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".