ASDNet: A robust involution‐based architecture for diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder utilising eye‐tracking technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a chronic condition characterised by impairments in social interaction and communication. Early detection of ASD is desired, and there exists a demand for the development of diagnostic aids to facilitate this. A lightweight Involutional Neural Network (INN) architecture has been developed to diagnose ASD. The model follows a simpler architectural design and has less number of parameters than the state‐of‐the‐art (SOTA) image classification models, requiring lower computational resources. The proposed model is trained to detect ASD from eye‐tracking scanpath (SP), heatmap (HM), and fixation map (FM) images. Monte Carlo Dropout has been applied to the model to perform an uncertainty analysis and ensure the effectiveness of the output provided by the proposed INN model. The model has been trained and evaluated using two publicly accessible datasets. From the experiment, it is seen that the model has achieved 98.12% accuracy, 96.83% accuracy, and 97.61% accuracy on SP, FM, and HM, respectively, which outperforms the current SOTA image classification models and other existing works conducted on this topic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".