Optimized parallelization of boundary integral Poisson-Boltzmann solvers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Poisson-Boltzmann (PB) model governs the electrostatics of solvated biomolecules, i.e., potential, field, energy, and force. These quantities can provide useful information about protein properties, functions, and dynamics. By considering the advantages of current algorithms and computer hardware, we focus on the parallelization of the treecode-accelerated boundary integral (TABI) PB solver using the Message Passing Interface (MPI) on CPUs and the direct-sum boundary integral (DSBI) PB solver using KOKKOS on GPUs. We provide optimization guidance for users when the DSBI solver on GPU or the TABI solver with MPI on CPU should be used depending on the size of the problem. Specifically, when the number of unknowns is smaller than a predetermined threshold, the GPU-accelerated DSBI solver converges rapidly thus has the potential to perform PB model-based molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulation. As practical applications, our parallelized boundary integral PB solvers are used to solve electrostatics on selected proteins that play significant roles in the spread, treatment, and prevention of COVID-19 virus diseases. For each selected protein, the simulation produces the electrostatic solvation energy as a global measurement and electrostatic surface potential for local details.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".