DinoKnot: Duplex Interaction of Nucleic Acids With PseudoKnots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interaction of nucleic acid molecules is essential for their functional roles in the cell and their applications in biotechnology. While simple duplex interactions have been studied before, the problem of efficiently predicting the minimum free energy structure of more complex interactions with possibly pseudoknotted structures remains a challenge. In this work, we introduce a novel and efficient algorithm for prediction of Duplex Interaction of Nucleic acids with pseudoKnots, DinoKnot follows the hierarchical folding hypothesis to predict the secondary structure of two interacting nucleic acid strands (both homo- and hetero-dimers). DinoKnot utilizes the structure of molecules before interaction as a guide to find their duplex structure allowing for possible base pair competitions. To showcase DinoKnots's capabilities we evaluated its predicted structures against (1) experimental results for SARS-CoV-2 genome and nine primer-probe sets, (2) a clinically verified example of a mutation affecting detection, and (3) a known nucleic acid interaction involving a pseudoknot. In addition, we compared our results against our closest competition, RNAcofold, further highlighting DinoKnot's strengths. We believe DinoKnot can be utilized for various applications including screening new variants for potential detection issues and supporting existing applications involving DNA/RNA interactions, adding structural considerations to the interaction to elicit functional information.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".