How to Use Colonial Discourse Against Colonialism: Strategies of Research-Creation in French Symbolist Art, ca. 1890
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose d’examiner l’art symbolisme en France vers 1890, plus précisément certains artistes ayant utilisé un savoir colonial imprégné de racisme dans leurs productions, sous l’angle de caractéristiques liées à la recherche-création et aux théories postcoloniales. Cette perspective permettra d’éclairer et d’identifier certains éléments de la production symboliste, associés à l’occultisme et à la théosophie et influencés par la mise en place d’une institutionnalisation du colonialisme. Des artistes, tels que Paul Ranson, impatients de découvrir l’art de l’Asie du Sud-Est, ne pouvaient le faire que par le biais de la propagande présentée lors des expositions universelles, ou au sein des sciences dites coloniales. La recherche-création combinée aux théories postcoloniales permet ainsi de révéler de quelle manière le travail de ces artistes a su s’approprier et subvertir cette propagande raciste et coloniale de la fin du XIX e siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".