From John Cage to the Outdoor School: Activating the “Minor” through Mycological Forays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la foulée des réflexions d’Erin Manning et Brian Massumi conceptualisant la recherche-création en tant qu’expression de ce qui est de l’ordre du mineur, le présent article propose une exploration du rituel créatif de l’incursion mycologique en tant que recherche-création. L’incursion, comme la recherche-création, perturbe les principaux systèmes régissant les méthodes institutionnelles (universitaires, scientifiques, anthropologiques, artistiques) et s’attarde aux rencontres fortuites indéterminées qui surviennent lors de la quête de champignons. Cet article établit un lien entre l’intérêt que le compositeur américain John Cage a entretenu toute sa vie pour les champignons et les incursions contemporaines dirigées par le commissaire et écrivain Amish Morrell et la créatrice en art visuel et en performance Diane Borsato, ainsi que le travail de revitalisation écologique du collectif japonais, Matsutake Crusaders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".