Journeys, Merged Objects, and Public Art: Situating Practices of Salish Weaving as Research-Creation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans l’histoire de l’art, les textiles autochtones coutumiers ont été ignorés en tant qu’artisanat domestique « traditionnel » et objets fonctionnels. Axé sur la documentation du tissage salish depuis les années 1960 et sur l’intégration des méthodologies de recherche autochtones et non autochtones, cet essai explorera la résurgence du tissage salish en tant que forme salish de recherche-création. Dans cet essai, une approche féministe autochtone centre l’expérience des tisserands salish pour changer les perceptions du tissage salish et pour déstabiliser les omissions structurelles dans les discours de l’art autochtone. Les tissages et les pratiques du tisserand deviennent visibles en tant que sites de partage des connaissances intergénérationnelles, d’innovation, de relations sociales complexes et de continuité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".