MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391772358 · doi:10.7202/1109073ar

Journeys, Merged Objects, and Public Art: Situating Practices of Salish Weaving as Research-Creation

2024· article· fr· W4391772358 on OpenAlex
Alison Ariss

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeavingEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans l’histoire de l’art, les textiles autochtones coutumiers ont été ignorés en tant qu’artisanat domestique « traditionnel » et objets fonctionnels. Axé sur la documentation du tissage salish depuis les années 1960 et sur l’intégration des méthodologies de recherche autochtones et non autochtones, cet essai explorera la résurgence du tissage salish en tant que forme salish de recherche-création. Dans cet essai, une approche féministe autochtone centre l’expérience des tisserands salish pour changer les perceptions du tissage salish et pour déstabiliser les omissions structurelles dans les discours de l’art autochtone. Les tissages et les pratiques du tisserand deviennent visibles en tant que sites de partage des connaissances intergénérationnelles, d’innovation, de relations sociales complexes et de continuité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it