MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391772383 · doi:10.7202/1109084ar

Stephanie Springgay, Feltness: Research-Creation, Socially Engaged Art, and Affective Pedagogies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2022, 224 pp., 63 color illus, $25.95 (paper) ISBN 9781478018902

2024· article· en· W4391772383 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Laura Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueRACAR Revue d art canadienne · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtSociologyMedia studiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stephanie Springgay, Feltness: Research-Creation, Socially Engaged Art, and Affective Pedagogies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2022, 224 pp., 63 color illus, $25.95 (paper) ISBN 9781478018902. Un article de la revue RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review (The Sources of Research‑Creation: Historical and Multiple Perspectives) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.139

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.017
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.309
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRACAR Revue d art canadienneSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207