MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391777677 · doi:10.1051/bioconf/20236803028

Tracing and tracking wine bottles: Protecting consumers and producers

2023· article· en· W4391777677 on OpenAlex
Jacques‐Olivier Pesme

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBIO Web of Conferences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicWine Industry and Tourism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTracingWineBusinessTracking (education)CommerceComputer securityAdvertisingComputer scienceFood scienceChemistrySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effective tracking and tracing of wine bottles is critical to ensure consumers are receiving high quality wine from the place of origin that is stated on the label and produced from grapes grown in that place. Wine production and its supply chain are controlled by different laws around the globe. From the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV) to the European Union (EU) and other national governments, suppliers and producers are required to provide specific documentation as the wines make their way to consumers. However, the wine industry loses billions from counterfeit wine and illicit trade. That is why the improvement of the methods applied to verify the origin and the quality of wines is important to protect wine consumers and producers. This short presentation explores what members of the Wine Origins Alliance (WOA) are doing within their respected regions to effectively trace and track their wine bottles along the entire value chain, with intelligent labeling and data recording through effective technology. Specifically, WOA provides case studies from its members that give an overview of the methods they have implemented (or are working to implement) to ensure consumers know the true origins of the wine. Their commitment to quality, traceability, and transparency are the very reasons why these regions are considered among the most renowned across the globe. Below are a few examples of the case studies that will be presented. * Chianti Classico. All the wines can be traced from the vineyard to the bottle as the entire production is monitored and recorded. Each bottle must be adorned with a government-issued label on the bottle neck, which contains an alphanumeric code that consumers can use to access the wine’s official chemical analysis and quantity bottled on the open database located on the Chianti Classico website. * Champagne. The General Syndicate of Winegrowers in Champagne (SGV) contracted with Advanced Track & Trace to supply the CLOE caps, which feature a unique serialized code and hologram. A QR code customized to the Champagne grower’s visual identity, which appears on the exterior of the cap, offers customers “access to each bottle's unique information, concealed on the inside of the cap. That includes a serial number, signature, message and illustration of the brand, as well as the ability to check the bottle's origin.” * Rioja. All wine bottles produced in the region are required to include numbered seals for specific zones or municipalities. But, in the Rioja Alta zone, producers have been using artificial vision to photograph each bottle, scanning the code and marking it on the bottle with ultraviolet (UV) link and integrating it into each winery’s computer systems, allowing wineries “to identify and monitor each and every bottle individually, from the moment the wine is labelled until it is delivered to every client, distributor or importer anywhere in the world.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it