Carbon-Nitrogen Ratios And Performance Of Nile Tilapia And Stinging Catfish In Biofloc Based Juvenile Rearing System.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A four-month indoor culture experiment was led to assess the impact of shifting C: N ratio on production, feed utilization, and physio-chemical parameters of biofloc-based juvenile rearing systems of Nile tilapia and stinging catfish with varying carbon-nitrogen proportions (C/N). The experiment contained different C: N ratios with every three replicates of 5:1, 10:1, 15:1, and 20:1 along with control. The outcomes indicate that the C/N ratio of 15: 1 combined with minute water exchange is ideal for enhanced survival and growth. After the feeding trial, a significant increase (p<0.01) of 55.8% was observed in specific amylase activity in the C: N ratio 5: 1 in hepatopancreas, but no significant differences (p>0.05) were observed in amylase activity in the gut as compared to control. Whereas, a significant increase (p<0.01) of 84.3 and 82.3% was observed in the protease activity in the C: N ratio 5: 1 respectively in hepatopancreas and gut.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".