Morphological Predictors of Primary Lung Cancer among Part-Solid Ground-Grass Nodules on High-Resolution CT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent advancements in computed tomography (CT) scanning have improved the detection rates of peripheral pulmonary nodules, including those with ground-glass opacities (GGOs). This study focuses on part-solid pure ground-glass nodules (GGNs) and aims to identify imaging predictors that can reliably differentiate primary lung cancer from nodules with other diagnoses among part-solid GGNs on high-resolution CT (HRCT). A retrospective study was conducted on 609 patients who underwent surgical treatment or observation for lung nodules. Radiological findings from pre-operative HRCT scans were reviewed and several CT imaging features of part-solid GGNs were examined for their positive predictive value to identify primary lung cancer. The proportions of the nodules with a final diagnosis of primary lung cancer were significantly higher in part-solid GGNs (91.9%) compared with solid nodules (70.3%) or pure GGNs (66.7%). Among CT imaging features of part-solid GGNs that were evaluated, consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR) < 0.5 (98.1%), pleural indentation (96.4%), and clear tumor border (96.7%) had high positive predictive value to identify primary lung cancer. When two imaging features were combined, the combination of CTR < 0.5 and a clear tumor border was identified to have 100% positive predictive values with a sensitivity of 40.8%. Thus we conclude that part-solid GGNs with a CTR < 0.5 accompanied by a clear tumor border evaluated by HRCT are very likely to be primary lung cancers with an acceptable sensitivity. Preoperative diagnostic procedures to obtain a pathological diagnosis may potentially be omitted in patients harboring such part-solid GGNs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".