Human-scale navigation of magnetic microrobots in hepatic arteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using external actuation sources to navigate untethered drug-eluting microrobots in the bloodstream offers great promise in improving the selectivity of drug delivery, especially in oncology, but the current field forces are difficult to maintain with enough strength inside the human body (>70-centimeter-diameter range) to achieve this operation. Here, we present an algorithm to predict the optimal patient position with respect to gravity during endovascular microrobot navigation. Magnetic resonance navigation, using magnetic field gradients in clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is combined with the algorithm to improve the targeting efficiency of magnetic microrobots (MMRs). Using a dedicated microparticle injector, a high-precision MRI-compatible balloon inflation system, and a clinical MRI, MMRs were successfully steered into targeted lobes via the hepatic arteries of living pigs. The distribution ratio of the microrobots (roughly 2000 MMRs per pig) in the right liver lobe increased from 47.7 to 86.4% and increased in the left lobe from 52.2 to 84.1%. After passing through multiple vascular bifurcations, the number of MMRs reaching four different target liver lobes had a 1.7- to 2.6-fold increase in the navigation groups compared with the control group. Performing simulations on 19 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) demonstrated that the proposed technique can meet the need for hepatic embolization in patients with HCC. Our technology offers selectable direction for actuator-based navigation of microrobots at the human scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".