Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2016, I embarked on an artist's residency curated by Access Gallery (Canada), sailing aboard a cargo ship from Vancouver to Shanghai, spending approximately 23 days at sea. Whilst on board, I came across the ship's log - a public, legal record that noted routine information about our crossing. The ship's log offered up a device to be in conversation between my body and the body of the ship. Written in pencil, updated every four hours by an officer, sometimes erased, wanting and partial, we must remember: logbooks are capable of concealing as much as they reveal. The mythic realm of an ocean crossing makes space for the dance of the writer to apply embodied compositional strategies: choreography that writes. Multiple histories located in a single body, through the accumulated influence and distinctive lineage of practice, emergent content arrives from the state of double embodiment, as both dancer and writer, experienced as a rolling overlap of unfixed embodiments. "Logging" then as slippage between the waves; above, below and in-between; as a choreographic experimental mode of capture, generating a collective document in conversation with a travelling event that was part-pragmatic, part-mythic, part-recall, part-speculative and most importantly, performative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it