La course à pied dans une association de la communauté lesbienne, gaie, bisexuelle et trans* (LGBT) : inclusivité ou homonormativité?1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le mouvement sportif de la communauté lesbienne, gaie, bisexuelle et trans* (LGBT) français, institutionnalisé et reconnu par diverses organisations politiques, militantes et sportives, fait la promotion d’une inclusion de toutes les personnes dans des espaces sécuritaires (safe). L’étude d’une des associations historiques de ce mouvement permet cependant de constater la reproduction de hiérarchies sociales et l’absence de remise en question des normes et des catégories du champ sportif. La volonté masculine hégémonique d’intégration et d’adaptation aux normes hétérosexistes et l’apolitisme revendiqué par cette association construisent en réalité une absence de politisation de l’« identité LGBT » affichée, de sorte que les espaces sportifs et sociaux de l’association ne sont pas accessibles également à toutes et à tous.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".