MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Project BANAS Materials to the Academic Performance of Learners: Basis for Enhancement Plan

2024· article· en· W4391816590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aireen Joan D Concha, Argonne Robert A Ablanque, Pinky Pamela S Guanzon

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMedical educationPlan (archaeology)Quality (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Mathematics educationReading (process)MedicineGeographyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This descriptive quantitative research is a scientific inquiry which aimed to determine the level of Impact of Project BANAS Materials (a collective name of the competency-based division-initiated print and non-print resources in Social Studies) in relation to academic performance of learners. This study was conducted in the seven (7) elementary schools of District VII, Division of Bacolod City during the School Year 2022-2023. Researcher-made questionnaire used in this study was validated by three (3) experts. It has undergone reliability testing with thirty (30) respondents at Andres Bonifacio Elementary School I. Data were collected during the Second Quarter of the School Year from three hundred eighty-three (383) learners in Grades 1 to 5. Highlight of this study examined and analyzed the level of Impact of BANAS materials in terms of these four (4) areas namely: Alignment of Content, Quality of Material, Applicability, and Ease of Use. Findings showed that BANAS Materials in terms of these four (4) areas have a very high impact regardless of sex, grade level, school, and average family monthly income. Based on these findings, BANAS Materials is highly recommended to be utilized by Social Studies teachers and learners as supplementary reading and teaching materials respectively. Results further reveal that there is a need to conduct division training-workshops in the development and quality assurance of additional BANAS Materials focused on competencies not covered in the BANAS Outputs developed in the previous years. Conduct of SOK-SAY-LYMPICS Series: BANAS Quizzes, ATBP is highly recommended as sustainable initiatives aligned on Assessment and Monitoring Key Result Areas. Through Policy Recommendation, the long-term goal of this research is the Institutionalization of BANAS Learning Hub in 46 Elementary Schools in the Division of Bacolod City. Not only regular learners are the target direct beneficiaries of BANAS Print and Non-Print Materials but also Madrasah Education Program (MEP) and Special Needs Education (SNED) learners. Sustainability and successful implementation of this research-cum-innovation needs the collaboration between and among school leaders and DepEd Officials to truly realize the end goals on the need to address scarcity of localized resources, improve reading literacy across disciplines through in-depth love for one’s unique and distinct local heritage. Sequel researches are also highly recommended to done by future teacher-researchers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and StudiesSame topicEducational Methods and Media UseFrench-language works237,207