MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391823155 · doi:10.4324/9781003383178-17

Collegiate Esports in South Korea and the United States

2024· book-chapter· en· W4391823155 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lars Dzikus, Yoonkyu Song

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyPolitical scienceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Students in US colleges and universities have organised esports teams since at least the early 2000s. Important milestones in the development include the establishment of collegiate Starleague in 2009 with 24 schools in the United States and 2 in Canada. By the mid-2010s, collegiate varsity programs emerged. In 2014, for example, Robert Morris University in Chicago (now Roosevelt University) announced scholarships for its League of Legends team as part of its athletic program. Founded in 2016, the National Association of Collegiate Esports (NACE) emerged as a possible governing body. Despite its contested status, NACE reported over 170 member institutions with over 5,000 student-athletes in 2020. In this chapter, I will trace the organisational development of intercollegiate esports. The discussion of governance illustrates historical parallels between college football and college esports with regard to converging but also competing interests of various stakeholders (e.g. students, faculty, administrators, athletic departments, and governing bodies).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Games and MediaFrench-language works237,207