MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4391824714 · doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101628

Corrigendum to “Parents' attitudes regarding their children's play during COVID-19: Impact of socioeconomic status and urbanicity”. [SSM - Popul. Health. (24) (2023) 101-549]

2024· erratum· en· W4391824714 on OpenAlexaff
Leigh M. Vanderloo, Kendall Saravanamuttoo, Brianne A. Bruijns, Matthew Bourke, Shiran Zhong, Monika Szpunar, Jason Gilliland, Shauna M. Burke, Jennifer D. Irwin, Stephanie Truelove, Patricia Tucker

Bibliographic record

VenueSSM - Population Health · 2024
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsCollege of Family Physicians of CanadaChildren’s Health Research InstituteLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyEnvironmental healthDevelopmental psychologySocial psychologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101549.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0090.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1050.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSM - Population HealthSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207